Subscribers

Blog Archive

Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Religious Intolerance In Indiana... And Everywhere Else

Imagine you are a Certified Public Accountant in Los Angeles and it's tax season. Imagine a famous person of some sort (of which there are many in Los Angeles) walks through your door and wants to hire you to do his taxes. Imagine that this person is infamous for being intolerant. It doesn't really matter what this person is intolerant of be it race, religion, gender, age, sexual persuasion, but let's assume that whatever it is, it's a topic that is near to your heart. Maybe he hates blacks and though you're white, your wife is black. Maybe he hates Muslims and your best friend is Muslim. Maybe he hates gays and your kid sister is a Lesbian. Whatever it is, this potential client is completely vile in his hatred. Now imagine this famous person is also wealthy (not a big stretch) and working for him will make you a lot of money. Furthermore, imagine that you feel so strong in your convictions that you refuse to give him the service he desires. You turn him down as a client.

Now imagine that he sues you for discrimination. Then, imagine that you lose this case and therefore lose your license to practice as a CPA, thus creating huge obstacles in your life. Should you truly be punished for standing up for your convictions that not only you, but everyone you know believes in and agrees with?

Finally, imagine the same scenario except that the conviction you feel so strongly about is a religious belief and you feel strong enough about it not to want to serve someone who your god tells you you shouldn't.

You see, in America we have rights. Chief among these rights is the right to religious freedom. It's one of the rights our country was founded upon.
At this point I'd like to make very clear (not that I need to among any who know me, but) though I was brought up Jewish, I don't subscribe to any religion and indeed feel that I am actually ANTI-religious. I feel that ALL religions are inherently evil in nature (and I'm not using evil in any mystical supernatural god-y sort of way).

So, a lot is being made about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that was signed in Indiana, which by the way is the 20TH STATE to sign in this sort of law since 1994. Indiana's seems to be perhaps the broadest in scope of these. There are many that have even seen the inside of a court room: A police officer in Oklahoma claimed a religious objection when he refused to police a mosque. A photographer in New Mexico used religious freedom as a defense for not serving a lesbian couple in 2013. Another police officer in Salt Lake City cited his "religious liberty" when he refused to police a gay pride parade.

To be honest, my question is, WHO THE HELL CHOSE TO FILE THESE LAWSUITS?

Look, if I went to, say, a restaurant and was refused service because I'm Jewish, or because I'm under six feet tall, or because my eyes are brown, I would not file a discrimination suit. I would go to another restaurant, never return to the one which offended me, and badmouth it every chance I got. Why file suit? So that I can eat there knowing that the only reason I'm allowed is due to a court order? Do I feel winning that sort of case will make the owner of the business respect me and be more tolerant towards others like me? Will I get a petty sense of pride knowing that I put someone who I feel is in the wrong out of business? We in America litigate WAY too much and for reasons we should absolutely not be allowed to! But, that's another article.
On the flip side, let's say I'm that cop who refused to police the Pride Parade and I got fired for it. I sue the force to get my job back citing this law. Well, hey, it's part of my job as a Salt Lake City policeman to patrol any and every place in the city of Salt Lake. If I can't do this duty for whatever reason (religious included) then I'm not fit to serve on the force. End of story. Guess I should have thought about my religion before I swore to serve and protect every person in the city.

In my mind there is a difference between prejudice and intolerance.

Everyone is prejudiced... EVERYONE. There are very few Ghandi-like people in history who (supposedly) love everyone equally and to the utmost. Don't think you're prejudiced? Did you accept every offer for a date that you ever received in your life? Do you consider every person you know an equal friend? EVERYONE DISCRIMINATES. Maybe it makes you feel superior to know that you don't base your discriminations on a certain few criteria, but it makes you no better than those who do.

Everyone is prejudiced.

We cannot expect people to rid themselves of their prejudices. However, in America, we can expect them to rise above their prejudices. Because when they don't, it can lead to intolerance. Intolerance is using your prejudices to attack or deny another of his or her rights.
Perhaps this is where it gets murky. Because, why do you feel you have the right to walk into my business, no matter what that business is, and expect me to serve you? Seriously, why do you feel you have this right? Because I own a business? Aren't you taking away the rights of the business owner? Why do you feel this is ok?
On the other hand, we live in a democracy and let me explain to you what that means: If ONE more person in the country votes a certain way than the opposite, EVERYONE has to abide by that majority's rule. Doesn't matter if you know in your heart that whatever was voted for is right, wrong, or otherwise. We have rules in place to allow more votes in the future, but until more people feel another way (and vote for it), it's the law and we must all abide or suffer the consequences.

Thus, if we voted that to own a business you are legally not allowed to deny anyone service, then that is how you must run your business. That's not a law and I feel it never should be. Hell, if I want to open a business and serve no one, it should be my right. I mean it's not like you HAVE TO BUY from me if I own a business. Why should I HAVE TO SELL to you? I honestly believe if I wanted to place a sign in my store reading, "I do not serve minorities of ANY kind", that should be perfectly legal. I mean, if you saw that sign, why would you want to patronize the place anyway, and if no one did, it would go out of business as quickly as the shop that denied service to everyone.
So how do I feel about the RFRA in Indiana? I feel it SHOULD be unnecessary. I feel large businesses, defined as those with over 500 employees, should probably have to abide by SOME CERTAIN anti-discriminatory laws. Though really, if I own a multi-billion dollar corporation why shouldn't I be allowed to hire those I feel are best equipped to handle the different positions within it as opposed to a certain amount of minorities and handicapped who may not be the most capable or qualified? Or why shouldn't I be allowed to staff it with only my friends whether they're good at the jobs they hold or not. It's my damned company!

As for small businesses, I feel they should be able to hire whomever they choose and serve whomever they please with no fear of a court beyond the court of public opinion whose rulings, as we all know can be just as harsh, fickle, and illogical as those from any Supreme Court...

Thursday, January 15, 2015

God, Gays, and FIRE!!!

So, there is this Fire Chief in Atlanta who was fired (I like the pun there) by the Mayor because he wrote a book where among other things, he called homosexuality a “perversion,” compared it to bestiality and pedophilia, and said homosexual acts are “vile, vulgar and inappropriate.” These beliefs of his are due to his religion (isn't that always the case?).

I've read a few articles from different papers with varying viewpoints since it became a story about a week ago and figured you all wanted my opinion about whether or not I agreed with this dismissal. You do want to know what I think, right??? Ok, fine I'll tell you.

My first reaction was that I disagreed with the decision and I'll tell you why. The articles stated that despite his views, Fire Chief Cochran showed no evidence that he "treated lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees unfairly during his tenure". So, this guy has been Fire Chief for 5 years over the past 6 (with one year in the middle working for the Federal Government) and no one had a problem with his views until now.

Another article caused me to tip in the other direction when it made a few points. The first being that if his religion had been disparaging of say, white people... Or black people... Or Christians... He would have been fired as well and no one would have had a problem with it in the slightest. Probably true. The second point was that though everyone is entitled to his own religious beliefs, public officials need to be held to a higher standard. Again, my first reaction is that I totally agree with this, but upon further review, I realize that I don't really. Because, what this means is that it's completely ok if this man hates gays, and I'm not saying he does, just that it would be ok if he does, as long as he never mentions it to anyone. How can that possibly be the right thing to do? Seems far better to me that a person informs us of his ethical standings whichever way they lean and then we judge him on his actions instead of his beliefs.

Hey, not a day goes by where I don't have murderous intent in my heart! But, I've never murdered anyone and highly doubt that I ever will. Should I be judged as a murderer or by my actual actions towards those I'd like to kill (which are often times quite kind for the simple reason that I'm a pretty nice fellow)? It reminds me of how we choose other public officials (or at least how I do it).

Just because a nominee says he feels one way or another about a certain subject may not necessarily be what his voting record shows. Do you select a representative based on what he 'says' or what he 'does'? And someone who is wishy-washy, whose actions might be swayed by the winds? That person would never be marked on my ballot. For good or for bad, I wanna know what people truly believe.

Look, I've written about prejudice before: We all have it. EVERY SINGLE PERSON makes judgments constantly in his life. We do it so often we don't recognize it. Did you choose eggs for breakfast this morning? You just made a judgment against cereal (among other things). Sound silly? It's absolutely not. Everyone is prejudiced. EVERYONE. The trick is not allowing your prejudices to affect your actions. Seems impossible? It's absolutely not. Why?

Well, in 6 years as Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran showed no evidence that he "treated lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees unfairly during his tenure".

So, to conclude, do I believe Cochran should have been fired?

YES!

Wha-huh???

Let me explain and it has absolutely nothing to do with anything that has been previously written. I don't think Cochran should be fired for his beliefs (even though I feel they are RESOUNDINGLY WRONG) and I don't think he should be fired for stating his beliefs loud and clear.

The investigation to determine if the publication of the book was authorized (which was the given reason for the Chief's termination and a subject I won't touch because I really don't care) uncovered this fact: "There was a consistent sentiment among the witnesses that firefighters throughout the organization are appalled by the sentiments expressed in the book".

And this fact, more than any other is reason enough for a firing. If a manager of over a thousand employees has lost the confidence of said employees, he or she should not be in that position. Period.

It's unfortunate, because, again, I don't feel he's being judged by his actions. But, if you're holding office of any sort and you choose to share your opinions (and I feel you should if you feel ethically bound) you run this risk, right or wrong.

Cochran chose to share his religious beliefs. Turns out a lot of people disagree with them. Maybe he should take a look at those beliefs and why people don't like them.

He should have plenty of time now while searching for a new job...

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Holiday Decorations... Bah Humbug!

Ah, the holidays! Festive Food. Presents. Parties. Presents. NBA. College Football. Presents. School Vacations. Days off work. Presents. Family. Friends. Presents. Religion (for some). Presents. Snow (for some). Holiday Songs. Good will to all (for some). And let's not forget... Presents! Oh yeah, and DECORATIONS.

And so, as has become popular in recent years (I swear it did not exist when I was young) we have a debate on what sort of decorations, if any, we're ALLOWED to display.

Obviously this discussion is tied up around religious beliefs (as many ridiculous topics are). So, let's get this out of the way to start. According to Wikipedia I am what's considered an AGNOSTIC ATHEIST. This is different from a straight Atheist, straight Agnostic, or any of the gajillions of sub denominations that occur out there. On a side note, I just discovered this about myself fairly recently. By which I mean that I've known for a long time this is how I felt, but never realized there was an actual term that identified it so clearly. I love Wikipedia! OK, for those who don't know what this means or are too lazy to look it up here's the websites' definition: The view of those who do not believe in the existence of any deity, but do not claim to know if a deity does or does not exist.

On the other hand I thoroughly identify CULTURALLY as Jewish. It's how I was brought up and though I disregard the religious aspects, it is an important part of my life. Now you say I can't possibly reconcile those two ideas. How can I answer that? Hmmm. Oh yeah: Fuck off! I will not live by your weird rules and parameters so don't try to force me.

So, as an Agnostic Atheistic Jew what are my thoughts on holiday decorations? I imagine you're just dying to know.

Well here it is: Decorate as you please! Anywhere! Anything! Anyhow! I don't care. I love decorations. Any decorations. None offend me in any way. If you choose to have Satanic style decorations at your place, I think that is just freaking awesome! I would pay to see a plastic display of baby Satan in a manger surrounded by orgiastic animals engaging in blood sacrifice while three fire breathing demons reenacted the giving of gold, frankenstein, and mud (as long as it was all completely safe and the flames from the fire breathing demons aimed to the sky without any possibility of damage or injury).

And furthermore I don't care if this is staged at a house, school, church, government center, park, or mall (again, as long as it is all completely safe).

The idea that anyone takes issue with holiday decorations be they public or private is simply beyond my comprehension.

What I'm reading is that Christians feel they should be able to put up extremely religious based decorations basically anywhere they please because "America is a Christian nation at heart".

Non Christian religionists feel offended because they're having Christmas "Rammed down their throats and slighted because no one ever puts out their religious ornamentations".

Non-Religionists are threatened by the religious aspects that they feel are dangerous as well as the feeling that "Public places such as Schools, Parks, or Government Buildings should fall under separation of church and state".

I think I've covered all the angles. And because groups of people left without guidance can almost never come to an intelligent conclusion I often read stories about places where the people have decided that there will be no decorations of any kind so as not to offend anyone. There's always follow ups to this that mentions the Christians feel like Christmas is being taken away from them (usually by evil Jews or Muslims (shiver)).

Ya'll are just crazy!

Anyone should be free to decorate his or her private place however he or she wants (as long as it's not PHYSICALLY dangerous). I'm fairly certain there's something in our constitution that decrees this. If you don't want yourself or your family to see it, then don't look.

Ok, but what about public areas? Places we all HAVE to go? Why should we be forced to see these vile ornamental props when we're out and about since a baby jesus or a dressed up tree offends some to their very core? Why should we be forced to put up silver and blue crap when we only want to see green and red crap and GOD FORBID someone make us look at whatever crap it is that those Kwanzaa people use to celebrate their heathen religion!?!?

Well, I'll tell you: It's because America is a melting pot that promotes Freedom of Religion and Expression! I honestly feel that if you have a community of all Christians and they decorate their entire city to celebrate Christmas, this should be completely fine and it's none of your freaking business if you don't live there! However, if they have one African who wants to have Kwanzaa decorations, the city should do it's best to accommodate him. Period. Thus, any public spot that has one style should have both. Or more if there is a more diverse community and those members request it. And why not? Is there truly no room to celebrate all these holidays publicly?

And if non-religionists have a problem with this, I feel it's simply too bad for them. If they live in a town where EVERYONE wants no decorations in public spots, then so be it! Otherwise I think they need to get over it.

I grew up in a very multi-ethnic community. I always felt accepted (religiously speaking), but I do recall as a youngster only very rarely ever seeing Hanukkah decorations outside of personal abodes. It simply didn't bother me. In fact, I never thought about it at all. My house was always decorated Jewishly (if that' a word) and it was fine by me. Look, if I was truly upset by this, then as an adult I would have worked toward making sure there were Hanukkah decorations displayed around my city every year along with the Christmas ones. And believe me, it could have been done. There was (and is) a HUGE Jewish population where I grew up in South Florida. If you feel the need to do this, fine. It simply didn't matter to me and still doesn't.

Seeing Christmas, or Kwanzaa, or Festivus, or (I don't know) Ramadan decorations does not offend or threaten me. I never feel they're being rammed down my throat, belittling my own beliefs, or causing myself or my children (if I had children) to be confused about religion in any way.

I'm guessing this is because 1. I'm an incredibly well adjusted person and 2. I'm very confident in who I am and in my beliefs. If someone tells me their religion is better than mine I don't take them at face value or feel threatened. I can make educated decisions for myself and if my children have any questions arising from holiday decorations I feel perfectly competent to be able to discuss these rationally with them so they too will be able to only feel joy at seeing them.... As I do.

Because in the end, that's what they're for. Oh sure, some people are truly moved by the religious aspects of holiday decorations and that's awesome. They should be if they want. While others should be able to enjoy them simply for the beauty or joyful feelings seeing them brings. If for some reason a particular decoration doesn't bring you happiness, perhaps you should figure out why. Maybe it's you who has an issue and not the decoration. Or maybe you can simply ignore that particular spot and check out some others. If all decorations upset you... You're the fucking Grinch, go slink off to a cave with your dog until Christmas is over. (On second thought, don't take your dog, he probably likes the decorations).

Either way, I sincerely wish, for everyone out there in the world to be able to enjoy ALL the decorations and have a HAPPY HOLIDAY!!!

Friday, February 10, 2012

I Pledge Allegiance...

So, the pledge of allegiance…

Pretty cut and dried, huh? You stand up, place your hand over your heart, recite the litanic words, and it displays your patriotism and respect for our country. How could there be anything wrong with that? Why would we choose to allow people to have the right NOT to stand up or NOT to HAVE to recite the words when they are spoken?

There’s this cartoon I’ve seen passed around that shows a classroom full of students standing during a pledge with one boy smack dab in the front seated with his feet on his desk, his arms crossed, and a rather surly expression on his face that clearly reads, “I don’t have to stand for this shit” while a teacher stands beside a war veteran in a wheel chair and says, “Kevin, it’s your right not to stand during the pledge… But let me introduce you to someone who CAN’T stand because he was defending that right.”

Should make that kid and anyone else who has the nerve to be so disrespectful feel pretty shitty, am I right?

NO.
My first thought about this cartoon was that something seems a little off about dying (or in this case losing the ability to stand up) to give a particular right to people and then getting all high and mighty when they choose to use it. But, upon further review I think there may be something quite a bit more insidious going on here.

A friend of mine understood what I was getting at but pointed out that she felt the cartoon was more about appreciation. I totally agree and that’s where it gets kinda fuzzy and turns into something of a religious debate. Wha-huh? That’s right, a religious debate.

One of the many things I hate about religion is that it basically tells people, “This is the correct way to worship and if you do it any other way not only are you wrong and a bad person, but you’re going to hell!”

Isn’t this basically the same thing?

If you don’t appreciate our veterans and show your patriotism in the WAY I FEEL YOU SHOULD (by standing and reciting the pledge) you’re a disrespectful, unpatriotic, and evil person who doesn’t deserve the liberty your country has afforded you.

Now, just as I feel a person has a right to worship god (or not worship god if he so chooses) in whatever way he pleases, I feel people have the right to honor the flag (or not) in any way they choose and we should not make them feel bad about their choices.

Look, I said the pledge every school day morning from kindergarten to twelfth grade (13 years) and I can tell you that NOT ONCE did I do it with any patriotism or sense of national pride. Forcing a child to stand and say some words will not have that effect. It simply automatous.

Each person has his own responsibility to decide if he 1) chooses to respect his country in any, all, some, or none of its facets and 2) how he wants to show (or not show) that respect. And what fucking business is it or yours anyway???

If you speak out against the President or US policies aren’t you being disrespectful to America? Any self-respecting Republican would argue against that sentiment until he’s blue in the face, correct? We have a god given (and American-given) right to bash Obama as much as humanly possible. Of course those same people would have argued just as fiercely in the other direction a few years ago when we had a different fellow in the White House.

You see, that’s the principle our country was built on: Freedom! Freedom to choose. Freedom of expression. Freedom of speech.

It’s ok not to like someone for whatever reason you want. It’s ok to express your distastes. But it’s NOT OK TO INJURE THAT PERSON IN ANY WAY BECAUSE YOU DON’T LIKE HIM (neither physically, mentally, or any other way there is of doing harm).

And that’s what rules about the pledge are doing; they’re telling you not only to look down on someone who may show his appreciation in a different way then you do, but make him feel guilty (which IS an injury). And do you think it stops there? When do Kevin’s schoolmates, stirred up by their parents who are appalled that he didn’t stand up during the pledge, beat the shit out of little Kevin on the playground after school?

Think that’s ridiculous? They’ll do it if he’s a different religion… Or a different color… Or a different sexuality…

And it IS from the adults. It’s learned behavior. Children don’t hate other children for their ideology on their own.

Well, I hope this didn’t become too convoluted and that it didn’t make anyone who wants to stand and say the pledge stop doing it. Patriotism is great. So is showing respect for those you have it for. Do it as much as you like. Only please don’t force your ideas on others. That’s UNAMERICAN.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Communion

One hundred years is a long life; but not so long as some. Today I turn one hundred years old and I feel I must unburden myself of the terrible secret I’ve been keeping since I was a teenager. Perhaps with this letter I can stop the horror that has been going on for thousands of years.

Twelve months ago, at the age of ninety-nine I was relieved of my duties and brought here to this hospital to live out my remaining time. My body quickly began to fail, but I have spent every moment possible of this last year learning the skills that would allow me to tell my tale. I learned to read and write. Now, finally, I can give my confession.

I was born without vocal chords and am therefore mute. Growing up, many people equated this inability to speak with stupidity as if one who can not talk must be dumb. I personally feel I’m quite the opposite, but truly, what does any man really know? Perhaps the only thing one can know for sure is that he knows nothing. Was that Socrates? Or Plato… I can’t recall all those Greeks. And what does it matter in the end?

As you may know I’m Roman and though Rome joined the unified State of Italy forty years before my birth there were still many around who considered themselves Romans before Italians while I was growing up. My father was one of these and he instilled in me a great pride of my heritage and my native town and its ties with my religion: Catholicism.

My family was one of zookeepers for many generations. After the first great war there were many who enjoyed peaceful days in the sun, gazing at the likes of caged majestic lions and playful monkeys. I took care of these sorts of animals and many others. I suppose it was this skill as much as the fact of my inability to utter a sound that made me desirable to the Vatican.

It was shortly after Vatican City forged its autonomy in 1929 that my father was approached about my services. He was, of course, quite honored by the fact that his only son was chosen to carry out secret duties inside the consecrated walls and basically sold my life to the Holy See for but a few Lira.

Under the catacombs of Saint Peters’ Cathedral I was to spend the vast majority of the next eighty-three years of my life tending to the most holy, or should I say most unholy of secrets.

I can still vividly recall the first day I was led underground. There was a string hung sparsely with tiny uncovered light bulbs; each one illuminating an area just wide enough that one must pass through meters of pitch black before arriving at the next glowing spot. I walked the labyrinthine corridors amidst the smell of dirt and sulphur, passing niches filled with the bones of those long dead and my heart raced with fear and excitement. Few were allowed entrance to these passages. Fewer still survived to tell of it.
I was given my own quarters down there. Modest by some standards, I considered them luxurious compared to my home in Ciampino where my family had lived for over four hundred years before all that land was taken away by the military. But, these are things I’ve only heard through gossip during my years of service. I have not left the walls of the Vatican since I arrived some eighty-three years ago.

I was given a day to orient myself to my new surroundings and the following morning I was introduced to my charge. Again, I was led through the maze dug out by ancient personages. This time however, I was blindfolded. Four times a day I was brought in this manner back and forth from my room to the cells of the one I was to tend to.

He was huge and at first I thought he was a leper and crossed myself repeated praying to God that this was not truly my fate. The wounds all across his body I later discovered were man made and not the ravishments of any known disease. He was chained to the floor and ceiling, but spent the majority of his time lying upon a kingly bed. He had fouled the bed and himself and would thousands of times over in the eighty plus years I would care for him.

That was my job.

When I saw him on the second day he was much smaller. The wounds were far larger and covered most of his body as if someone had cut the majority of his flesh out from under his skin.

What were they doing and why? Who was this man? A demon? An enemy of Christ?

I cleaned and bathed him as was my obligation. Dressed his wounds. Tidied his room and changed his linen. I was also directed to catch any excess blood that oozed from him in bowls and jars that were always kept nearby. I made sure never to let it touch my skin believing it must be cursed if they were so intent on removing it. There was also a time when one of my chores was the try to get him to eat. They wanted him to eat more and more. They wanted him as fat as possible so they might continue to take of his flesh and blood. Later, when the technology arrived they force fed him with tubes. Each time, within a day or two he would heal and then plump up like a sow prepared for slaughter. This daily transformation never ceased to amaze me.

How he continued to live through these tortures was beyond me, but live he did.

I always had a hard time understanding why he was restrained. As big as he was he could never in a million years squeeze through the door of his chamber, nor could he waddle along the corridors of the catacombs even if they were lined with melted butter except in the day or so after his surgeries and then he was far too weak. Only a miracle could free him, but it seemed miracles were the norm for this one.

A few of his escapes were spoken of by various people in my presence over the years. Of course one of the worst drawbacks of being mute combined with the inability to write is being unable to easily ask questions. I had become adept at making myself understood through gestures, but questions about this prisoner were difficult. I discovered much by simply listening to the gossip of those few I met during my days.

There were two girls who brought meals down from the surface; one each for days and nights. The meals for the prisoner seemed to never stop coming. I never once heard the daytime woman speak and came to believe that she was as mute as I. The night shift girl was slow in the head, but she did often chatter with the guard who stood outside the caged mans cell. I imagine that after she delivered her bounty and stood outside the closed door pattering on a bit with the guard they probably never guessed that I could hear them clear as crystal while spoon-feeding the captive, or tidying his room, or bathing him.

As the years went by the people changed. The day shift woman became a hunchbacked boy who eventually grew into middle and old age. The guard was always a young strong Italian lad who wore the raiment of the Swiss Guard with an insignia I did not recognize. Instead of gold or silver stars on a blue background, he wore a single black star on the traditional blue. I saw at least thirty guards in my time. Then there was the gentleman who blindfolded me and led me through the tunnels. Finally, there were those who dealt with the prisoner. I rarely saw them, but knew they visited him often.

The prisoner never spoke to me though sometimes I heard him mumbling to himself in a language that I did not recognize. It was certainly not Italian. The noises he made most often were tortuous moans whilst I tended his wounds or when I touched him in any way.

His eyes were a deep grey and he always gazed at me with the most curious of expressions; sad, resentful, fearful, compassionate, angry, wise, and somehow forgiving all at once. I often thought of what a horrible existence this poor soul had and wondered why the Pope allowed this monstrousness to go on. Did the Pope even know? And what exactly was going on?

Often times I arrived for my duties as the doctors were leaving. Men in white smocks rolling cart after cart filled with deep pans of what could only be the prisoners flesh and buckets of his blood. It wasn’t until I had been working there for nearly fifty years that I found out where all the extractions went.

The guide who brought me back and forth from my chamber and covered my eyes with clothe usually made sure I could not see at all. But, in the thousands of times I was escorted back and forth there were hundreds of occasions when my blindfold allowed me a glimpse of my surroundings. It wasn’t like I could mention this to anyone…

Once, when my blindfold was too loose to be any real impediment to sight, the doctors asked my guide for some assistance. I was taken along with them into what I guessed must be some kind of factory. It was at this location that the gallons and gallons of the prisoners blood was diluted with wine and bottled. There were cases upon cases of the stuff all loaded into boxes labeled to be sent off to thousands of exotic locations.

I saw the huge hunks of flesh sliced down to tiny pieces and fed into ovens. Finally I glimpsed the result of what these Catholics were achieving as they packaged and loaded it into similar shipping boxes. It was all I could do not to fall to my knees and weep.

I understood everything at that moment and heaven help me but I did nothing to stop it. Though I did my duties with the utmost reverence and care it doesn’t change the fact that I DID continue doing my small part in their ungodly design for the next thirty years or more.

But, I prayed every night that the prisoner would be released from bondage and wondered how this could possibly be his fate. Was god really that cruel? How could the church do such a thing, especially to this most revered of people?

And now as I write this letter and devise a way to get it to the public without those from the Vatican finding out in the hopes that exposing them will end this abomination, the priest has arrived to sit with me as is the practice here. Since learning to read and write I am expected to give weekly confessions. This I do, but I omit anything about what I know of the secrets of the Vatican.

Father Gimello asks if I’d like to take communion and I become so violently repulsed that he leaves to hail a nurse. When he exits I hide my note under my pillow and wait for their return that I may refuse the Father his offer. Though to my undying shame I used to do it before I knew the truth, never again will I eat Christs’ flesh, nor drink his blood!